Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYurteri, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorMercan, Numan
dc.contributor.authorUgur, Levent
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-28T07:23:31Z
dc.date.available2025-03-28T07:23:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0936-8051
dc.identifier.issn1434-3916
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05449-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/6132
dc.description.abstractBackgroundClavicular midshaft fractures treated with titanium plates may encounter complications like implant failure. We assess if alternative biocompatible materials suchs as PLA, PLA/HA, PEEK offer comparable stability. Our study evaluates the biomechanical performance of these materials in surgical management of midshaft clavicle fractures.MethodsWe simulated a personalized fixation implant with four different materials and conducted finite element analysis in ANSYS to assess maximum von Mises stress (MvMs).ResultsThe MvMs occurring on the plates, screws, clavicle, and fracture site were recorded. MvMs on titanium material at the 6th hole level (764.79 MPa) and the 6th screw level (503.38 MPa), with the highest stresses observed at 48.52 MPa on the lateral clavicle at the 1st hole level and 182.27 MPa on the medial clavicle at the 6th hole level. In PLA material analyses, the highest MvMs were observed at the 3rd hole level (340.6 MPa) and the 3rd screw level (157.83 MPa), with peak stresses at 379.63 MPa on the lateral clavicle fracture line and 505.44 MPa on the medial clavicle fracture line. In PLA/HA material analyses, the highest MvMs were at the 3rd hole (295.99 MPa) and 3rd screw (128.27 MPa), with peak stresses at 220.33 MPa on the lateral clavicle and 229.63 MPa on the medial clavicle fracture line. In PEEK material analyses, the highest MvMs were at the 3rd hole (234.74 MPa) and 6th screw (114.48 MPa), with peak stresses at 184.36 MPa on the lateral clavicle and 180.1 MPa on the medial clavicle.ConclusionOur findings indicate that titanium material shows significantly higher stresses on plates and screws compared to those on the clavicle, suggesting a risk of implant failure. PLA and PLA/HA were inadequate for fixation. Although stress on the plate with PEEK material is higher than on the clavicle, it remains lower than titanium, indicating potential stability at fracture site. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPLAen_US
dc.subjectPLA/HAen_US
dc.subjectPEEKen_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectMidshaften_US
dc.titleComparison of the use of biocompatible materials and titanium in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures with a patient-specific plate: a finite element analysis studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridMercan, Numan/0000-0002-0581-7023
dc.authoridYURTERI, AHMET/0000-0001-5242-0275
dc.identifier.volume144en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3255en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3266en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85198710724en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00402-024-05449-5
dc.department-temp[Yurteri, Ahmet] Konya City Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, TR-42020 Konya, Turkiye; [Mercan, Numan] Kahramanmaras Necip Fazil City Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, TR-46050 Kahramanmaras, Turkiye; [Ugur, Levent] Amasya Univ, Mech Engn Dept, TR-05100 Amasya, Turkiyeen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001272534300005en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39008077en_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250328
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster