Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Duygu Sinanc
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-28T07:22:56Z
dc.date.available2025-03-28T07:22:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0032-0862
dc.identifier.issn1365-3059
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13997
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/5953
dc.description.abstractThe weight initialization technique for transfer learning refers to the practice of using pretrained models that can be modified to solve new problems, instead of starting the training process from scratch. In this study, six different transfer learning weight initialization strategies were proposed for plant disease detection: scratch (i.e., random initialization), pretrained model on cross-domain (ImageNet), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019), model trained on related domain (ISIC 2019) with cross-domain (ImageNet) weights, model trained on same domain (PlantVillage), and model trained on same domain (PlantVillage) with cross-domain weights (ImageNet). Weights from each strategy were transferred to a target dataset (Plant Pathology 2021). These strategies were implemented using eight deep learning architectures. It was observed that transferring from any strategy led to an average acceleration of convergence ranging from 33.88% to 73.16% in mean loss and an improvement of 8.72%-42.12% in mean F1-score compared to the scratch strategy. Moreover, although smaller and less comprehensive than ImageNet, transferring information from the same domain or related domain proved to be competitive compared to transferring from ImageNet. This indicates that ImageNet, which is widely favoured in the literature, may not necessarily represent the most optimal transfer source for the given context. In addition, to identify which strategies have significant differences, a post hoc analysis using Tukey's HSD test was conducted. Finally, the classifications made by the proposed models were visualized using Grad-CAM to provide a qualitative understanding of how different weight initialization strategies affect the focus areas of the models. Six transfer learning weight initialization strategies for plant disease detection were proposed, showing a 33.88%-73.16% faster convergence and an 8.72%-42.12% improvement in F1-score over random initialization.imageen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Pathologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectdeep learningen_US
dc.subjectexplainabilityen_US
dc.subjectplant disease detectionen_US
dc.subjecttransfer learningen_US
dc.subjectweight initializationen_US
dc.titleEffect of different weight initialization strategies on transfer learning for plant disease detectionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridSINANC TERZI, DUYGU/0000-0002-3332-9414
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2325en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2343en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.institutionauthorTerzi, Duygu Sinanc
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202940982en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ppa.13997
dc.department-temp[Terzi, Duygu Sinanc] Amasya Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Amasya, Turkiyeen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001302262900001en_US
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250328
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster