• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: Three-dimensional finite element analysis

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Date

2015

Author

Kan B.
Coskunses F.M.
Mutlu I.
Ugur L.
Meral D.G.

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

The aim of this three-dimensional finite element analysis study was to examine the biomechanical behaviour of dental implants and the surrounding bone under traumatic frontal force. Models were created of an edentulous atrophic mandible using cone beam computed tomography data from a patient; two titanium alloy implants (Ti-6Al-4V) were virtually inserted into the anterior of the mandible. Six different variations were modelled to represent differences in implant location (lateral incisor vs. canine placement) and implant length (monocortical, bicortical, and long-bicortical). A static force of 10 MPa was applied frontally to the symphysis region of each model, and the maximum equivalent von Mises strain of bone, maximum von Mises stress of implants, and chromatic force distributions in bone and implants were recorded. In general, when compared to lateral incisor placement, canine placement of implants resulted in greater von Mises stress on implants and greater equivalent von Mises strain on bone. The findings of the present study showed the distribution of traumatic force to be affected more by inter-implant distance than by implant length. The insertion of implants in the lateral incisor area was found to be a better solution than canine area placement in terms of frontal plane trauma and fracture risk. © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Source

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volume

44

Issue

7

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.002
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/588

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1574]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Instruction || Guide || Library || Amasya University || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: