• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   DSpace@Amasya
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
  •   DSpace@Amasya
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Physically based vs. data-driven models for streamflow and reservoir volume prediction at a data-scarce semi-arid basin

Erişim

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Tarih

2024

Yazar

Özdoğan-Sarıkoç, Gülhan
Dadaser-Celik, Filiz

Üst veri

Tüm öğe kaydını göster

Özet

Physically based or data-driven models can be used for understanding basinwide hydrological processes and creating predictions for future conditions. Physically based models use physical laws and principles to represent hydrological processes. In contrast, data-driven models focus on input–output relationships. Although both approaches have found applications in hydrology, studies that compare these approaches are still limited for data-scarce, semi-arid basins with altered hydrological regimes. This study aims to compare the performances of a physically based model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) and a data-driven model (Nonlinear AutoRegressive eXogenous model (NARX)) for reservoir volume and streamflow prediction in a data-scarce semi-arid region. The study was conducted in the Tersakan Basin, a semi-arid agricultural basin in Türkiye, where the basin hydrology was significantly altered due to reservoirs (Ladik and Yedikir Reservoir) constructed for irrigation purposes. The models were calibrated and validated for streamflow and reservoir volumes. The results show that (1) NARX performed better in the prediction of water volumes of Ladik and Yedikir Reservoirs and streamflow at the basin outlet than SWAT (2). The SWAT and NARX models both provided the best performance when predicting water volumes at the Ladik reservoir. Both models provided the second best performance during the prediction of water volumes at the Yedikir reservoir. The model performances were the lowest for prediction of streamflow at the basin outlet (3). Comparison of physically based and data-driven models is challenging due to their different characteristics and input data requirements. In this study, the data-driven model provided higher performance than the physically based model. However, input data used for establishing the physically based model had several uncertainties, which may be responsible for the lower performance. Data-driven models can provide alternatives to physically-based models under data-scarce conditions. © The Author(s) 2024.

Cilt

31

Sayı

27

Bağlantı

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/4391

Koleksiyonlar

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [458]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1574]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Yönerge | Rehber | İletişim |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Gelişmiş Arama

sherpa/romeo

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreBölüme GöreYayıncıya GöreKategoriye GöreDile GöreErişim ŞekliBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreBölüme GöreYayıncıya GöreKategoriye GöreDile GöreErişim Şekli

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Yönerge || Rehber || Kütüphane || Amasya Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: