Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Gözde Hafize
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Nuri
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Ayşe Özge Şimşek
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Şükran
dc.contributor.authorAkçin, Öznur Ergen
dc.contributor.authorAy, Ebru Batı
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-28T07:05:14Z
dc.date.available2025-03-28T07:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn03678245
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/4344
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fertilization is an important cultural practice used to support plant growth and development. Fertilizers provide plants with the nutrients they need, which help them to photosynthesize, grow and develop. Fertilizers are divided into two groups: organic and synthetic. Organic fertilizers are derived from organic materials such as manure, compost and bat guano. Synthetic fertilizers are produced using chemical methods. Methods: This study was conducted to determine the effects of different synthetic and organic fertilizer applications on silage quality and some micromorphological characteristics in maize plants. The study was conducted using a randomized complete block design with three replications. The RX-9292 silage maize variety was used as the plant material. Six different organic and synthetic fertilizer types with different contents (Control, Synthetic Fertilizer-1 (20 kg N, 8 kg P and 8 kg K per decare), Synthetic Fertilizer-2 (20 kg N, 10 kg P and 10 kg K per decare), Poultry Manure, Cattle Manure and Vermicompost). were used in the study. The ADF (%) (Acid Detergent Insoluble Fiber), NDF (%) (Neutral Detergent Insoluble Fiber), ADL (%) (Acid Detergent Insoluble Lignin), SDMR (%); (Silage Dry Matter Content) properties of the silage obtained were then examined. Additionally, the thickness of the cuticle, number and size of stoma-epidermis cells and stoma index o0f the leaves were measured and observed using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Result: As a result of the measurements and observations, it was found that both synthetic and organic fertilizer applications increased the yield and quality values in silage maize, but synthetic fertilizer applications were more advantageous than organic fertilizers. However, considering the environmental damage of synthetic fertilizers and the importance of organic fertilizer applications for animal health, organic fertilization is thought to be more appropriate. © (2024), (Agricultural Research Communication Centre). All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAgricultural Research Communication Centreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIndian Journal of Agricultural Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCell sizeen_US
dc.subjectChemical fertilizeren_US
dc.subjectEpidermal thicknessen_US
dc.subjectOrganic fertilizeren_US
dc.subjectSilage maizeen_US
dc.subjectStomataen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Synthetic and Organic Fertilizer Applications on the Micromorphological Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.) Leaves and Some Silage Quality Traitsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage752en_US
dc.identifier.endpage760en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208410687en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18805/IJARe.AF-874
dc.department-tempYıldırım G.H., Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, 53300, Turkey; Yılmaz N., Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Ordu University, Ordu, 52000, Turkey; Soysal A.Ö.Ş., Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Ordu University, Ordu, 52000, Turkey; Öztürk Ş., Department of Veterinary Medicine, Ulubey Vocational School, Ordu University, D Ordu, 52000, Turkey; Akçin Ö.E., Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, 52000, Turkey; Ay E.B., Department of Plant and Animal Production, Suluova Vocational School, Amasya University, Suluova, Amasya, 05500, Turkeyen_US
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250328
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster