Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemir, Hale
dc.contributor.authorAday, Aynur Dağlar
dc.contributor.authorYol, Cansu
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Tulin
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-28T06:52:37Z
dc.date.available2025-03-28T06:52:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1300-9818
dc.identifier.issn2147-124X
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1277480
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/4266
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences between the classical and follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma (CVPTC and FVPTC) in terms of the clinicopathological prognostic parameters. Material and Method: The study included 84 cases consisting of 37 CVPTC and 47 FVPTC. Patient age, gender and pathological prognostic parameters including multifocality, tumour size, tumour capsule, extrathyroidal extension, intratumoural and non-tumoural lymphocytic infiltration, tumoural stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were recorded for each case by using the pathology reports. Two variants were statistically compared in terms of these parameters. Results: FVPTC cases were older than CVPTC cases (p= 0.016). There was no difference in terms of gender. Although the median tumour size was similar in two groups, the tumours over 4 cm were significantly more common in FVPTC (p= 0.044). Encapsulation was significantly higher in the FVPTC (p= 0.010). Multifocality and extrathyroidal extension were more frequent in CVPTC but these results were not statistically significant. Nontumoural lymphocytic infiltration was significantly higher in CVPTC (p= 0.027), but there was no difference in terms of intratumoural lymphocytic infiltration. CVPTC and FVPTC were similar for the tumour stage and the lymph node metastasis. We had only one case with distant metastases and it was FVPTC. Conclusion: Two PTC variants appear to exhibit some different prognostic features from each other and this may require different management of them. However, more studies with larger series are needed for this decision.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFırat Tıp Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.subjectPapillary Thyroid Carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectClassical Varianten_US
dc.subjectFollicular Varianten_US
dc.titleComparison of the Classical and Follicular Variants of Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas in Terms of the Clinicopathological Prognostic Parametersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage86en_US
dc.identifier.endpage90en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1277480en_US
dc.department-tempAmasya Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Patoloji Anabilim Dalı, Amasya, Türkiye -- İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Tıbbi Genetik Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye -- Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Patoloji Kliniği, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye -- İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Patoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiyeen_US
dc.snmzKA_TR_20250328
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster