• Türkçe
    • English
  • Türkçe 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   DSpace@Amasya
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
  •   DSpace@Amasya
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the orthopaedics outpatient clinic

Erişim

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Tarih

2023

Yazar

Ozdemir M.
Yaradilmis Y.U.
Targal A.S.
Ozturk O.
Birinci B.

Üst veri

Tüm öğe kaydını göster

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted orthopaedic practice since it started. In our study, we aimed to examine these effects on outpatient services. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients who applied to the orthopedic outpatient clinic (n=1,518) in six months period under the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020-March 2021) and patients (n=1,207) who applied during the same period before the pandemic (September 2019-March 2020) were analyzed according to the demographic characteristics (age, gender), reasons for admission, duration of complaints, treatments applied, surgical acceptance rate, and compliance with treatment. RESULTS: The mean age in the pre-pandemic outpatient clinic admissions was 39.1 years (1-91 years), the gender ratio was 635/572 (Female/Male), the mean age of the patients was 38.1 years (1-95), and the sex ratio was 793/725 (F/M) during the pandemic. Admissions of patients with acute complaints decreased after the pandemic, and applications for subacute or chronic complaints increased. Applications for sports medicine, pediatrics, and hand surgery increased, applications for trauma, foot and ankle surgery decreased, and applications for oncology and spine did not change. Conservative treatment recommendations decreased, the surgical treatment recommendation did not change, and the rate of patients who were given only follow-up decisions increased. There was no significant difference in the treatment rejection and surgical acceptance rate. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that the number of traumas decreased, and the hospital admission duration extended. The increase in the consultation rate and follow-up preference indicates that the treatment is more conservative in this period. In this process, patients should be adequately informed about the precautions taken, and their treatment should not be interrupted. © 2023 Verduci Editore s.r.l. All rights reserved.

Cilt

27

Sayı

1

Bağlantı

https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202301_30899
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/2965

Koleksiyonlar

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [458]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1574]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2182]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Yönerge | Rehber | İletişim |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Gelişmiş Arama

sherpa/romeo

Göz at

Tüm DSpaceBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreBölüme GöreYayıncıya GöreKategoriye GöreDile GöreErişim ŞekliBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreBölüme GöreYayıncıya GöreKategoriye GöreDile GöreErişim Şekli

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Yönerge || Rehber || Kütüphane || Amasya Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: