dc.contributor.author | Ozturk A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Temel I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalcindag A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ucar F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yay F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-12T19:35:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-12T19:35:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 02504685 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2021-0280 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1167847 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/2919 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to verify the enzymatic ethanol analysis method and compare the technique with headspace gas chromatography (HS/GC). The limit of the blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification, precision, linearity, and accuracy of the enzymatic process were evaluated based on the data obtained. In addition, a method comparison was made between the enzymatic method and the HS/GC analysis method. It was seen that the enzymatic method was linear in the range of 14-450 mg/dL, the coefficient of variation and bias values ranged between 0.5-1.09% and 4.52-9.78%, respectively. The quantitative accuracy was 2.13% and 2.23% at concentrations of 41.16 and 95.82 mg/dL, respectively. When the regression analysis was performed between the results obtained using the enzymatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and HS/GC methods, y=0.966x + 2.084 linear relationship formula and regression coefficient of r2=0.9987, it was found that it showed a good agreement at a confidence interval of 5%. The findings showed that the enzymatic method had good linearity, excellent precision, and a high correlation with the higher-order comparator method, the HS/GC method, in the ethanol analysis. © 2022 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter Open Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Biochemistry | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | enzymatic method | en_US |
dc.subject | ethanol | en_US |
dc.subject | headspace gas chromatography | en_US |
dc.subject | method comparison | en_US |
dc.subject | method verification | en_US |
dc.title | Verification of enzymatic ethanol analysis method and method comparison with headspace gas chromatography | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Enzimatik etanol analiz yönteminin do?rulanmasl ve headspace gaz kromatografisi ile yöntem karşllaştlrmasl | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.department | Amasya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85130710997 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1167847 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/tjb-2021-0280 | |
dc.department-temp | Ozturk, A., Amasya University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Amasya, Turkey; Temel, I., The University of Health Sciences, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey; Yalcindag, A., The University of Health Sciences, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey; Ucar, F., The University of Health Sciences, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey; Yay, F., Omer Halisdemir University Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Nigde, Turkey | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | 56999901700 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6602609706 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6505932654 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 12785099900 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57710807100 | |