Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDuz, Muhammed Emin
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorMenekse, Elif
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T19:34:46Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T19:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1301-109X
dc.identifier.issn2147-8325
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tji.galenos.2022.58070
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1166324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/2715
dc.description.abstractObjective: There is no definitive information yet about antibody kinetics produced in response to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection. It is essential to know the antibody levels in different patient groups. Our study compared the immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin (IgG) type antibody levels developed against COVID-19 infection by age groups and first-time complaints. Materials and Methods: IgM and IgG levels were investigated on the day of diagnosis and on the 21st day on serum samples with a point-of-care tests device in ninety-lbur COVID-19 patients. Antibody responses were evaluated according to age groups and clinical complaints. Results: First day IgM levels than 21st day and 21st day IgG levels than the first day were significantly higher (p=0.006, p<0.001, respectively). IgG on the first day and IgM on the 21st day was positive (>1). While IgG type antibody response was dominant in children, it was found that a robust antibody response occurred in young adults and over 65 years of age. Conclusion: Anti-spike severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 IgM antibodies remain positive for more extended periods, unlike known infectious agents, and measuring positive IgG values on the first day is insignificant in terms of protection against infection and appears specific to COVID-19. While IgG type antibodies dominate children, strong IgG and IgM type responses can be detected in young adults and the elderly. Different antibody responses may develop according to clinical findings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Immunologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 virusen_US
dc.subjectviral antibodiesen_US
dc.subjectpoint-of-care testingen_US
dc.titleComparison of First and 21st Day anti SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgM and IgG Responsesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridGümüş, Alper/0000-0002-4453-6339
dc.authoridDÜZ, Muhammed Emin/0000-0002-1837-6415;
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage28en_US
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129682578en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1166324en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/tji.galenos.2022.58070
dc.department-temp[Duz, Muhammed Emin; Menekse, Elif] Amasya Univ, Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Training & Res Hosp, Clin Med Biochem, Amasya, Turkey; [Balci, Aydin] Afyonkarahisar Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Med, Dept Resp Dis, Afyon, Turkey; [Durmaz, Mustafa] Merzifon Kara Mustafa Pasa State Hosp, Clin Med Biochem, Amasya, Turkey; [Gumus, Alper] Basaksehir State Hosp, Clin Med Biochem, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000792387500004en_US
dc.authorwosidGümüş, Alper/AAW-1379-2021
dc.authorwosidDÜZ, Muhammed Emin/ABF-4918-2020
dc.authorwosiddurmaz, mustafa/GPX-8236-2022


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster