Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAtelge, M. R.
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Esenay
dc.contributor.authorKrisa, David
dc.contributor.authorAl-Samaraae, R. R.
dc.contributor.authorAbut, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorunalan, Sebahattin
dc.contributor.authorAtabani, A. E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T19:29:10Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T19:29:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361
dc.identifier.issn1873-7153
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/2217
dc.description.abstractBiogas has been investigated as an alternative biofuel in dual fuel operating mode in a direct injection diesel engine. However, there is not sufficient information about using modified fuels with biogas. This study aimed to investigate the effects of modified diesel fuel and biogas on combustion behavior, performance, and emissions characteristics at 1500 rpm constant speed with 5 different load conditions at an interval of 25%. Diesel was modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes with 30, 60, and 90 ppm. Diesel fuel and three modified fuels were used as pilot fuel and biogas was introduced through the intake manifold with the flow rate of 500 g/h as the primary fuel. Diesel mode fuels were denominated F1 while dual fuel mode fuels were labeled as F2, and the concentration levels were given subscript such as F2 (@60ppm). The experimental study revealed that modified fuel showed better combustion behaviors, performance, and emissions in comparison to diesel fuel. Further, the same trend was observed in the dual fuel mode. The maximum pressure of F2(@60 ppm) was 1% higher than F2 under dual fuel mode at the full load. Moreover, the coefficient of variation of the indicated mean effective pressure for dual fuel mode was found approximately 9.2, 6.9, 6.2, and 7.2% for F2, F2(@30 ppm), F2(@60 ppm), and F2(@90 ppm), respectively at full load. In addition, the energy share of biogas increased by 7.9, 8.7, and 7.1% for F2(@30 ppm), F2(@60 ppm), and F2(@90 ppm), respectively in comparison with F2 at full load. The highest decrease of brake specific energy consumption under the dual mode was obtained to be an 8% drop from F2(@60 ppm) compared to F2 at full load. At the same load, the brake thermal efficiency of F2(@30 ppm), F2(@60 ppm), and F2(@90 ppm) were noted to be 30.2, 30.4, and 30.0%, respectively which are higher than F2 (27.9%). The value of replaced diesel with biogas was noted 0.09, 0.23, 0.24, and 0.22 kg/h for F2, F2(@30 ppm), F2(@60 ppm), and F2(@90 ppm), respectively under the full load condition. Lastly, CO and HC emissions were almost the same value with and without modified fuel for dual fuel mode at the full load. Nevertheless, NO emission was slightly increased with modified fuel compared to F2. From these findings, it can be suggested that 60 ppm multi-walled carbon nanotubes additive can be an optimum level for combustion, performance, and emissions under the dual fuel mode.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofFuelen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDual fuel modeen_US
dc.subjectModified fuelen_US
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectBiofuelen_US
dc.subjectBiogasen_US
dc.subjectEngine performanceen_US
dc.subjectEmission characteristicsen_US
dc.titleComparative investigation of multi-walled carbon nanotube modified diesel fuel and biogas in dual fuel mode on combustion, performance, and emission characteristicsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentAmasya Üniversitesien_US
dc.authoridAtabani, Abdulaziz/0000-0001-6793-5589
dc.authoridDemir KIVRAK, Hilal/0000-0001-8001-7854
dc.authoridAtelge, Muhamed Raşit/0000-0002-0613-2501
dc.authoridARSLAN, ESENAY/0000-0001-5429-5471
dc.authoridAbut, Serdar/0000-0002-6617-6688
dc.authoridSarıkoç, Selçuk/0000-0003-1190-5238
dc.authoridARSLAN, ESENAY/0000-0001-5429-5471
dc.identifier.volume313en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121934938en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123008
dc.department-temp[Atelge, M. R.] Siirt Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-56100 Siirt, Turkey; [Arslan, Esenay] Kayseri Univ, Dept Elect & Energy, TR-38010 Kayseri, Turkey; [Krisa, David] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, UBC Bioreactor Technol Grp, Okanagan Campus,3333 Univ Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada; [Al-Samaraae, R. R.] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Energy Div, Aydin, Turkey; [Abut, Serdar] Siirt Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-56100 Siirt, Turkey; [unalan, Sebahattin; Atabani, A. E.; Akansu, Selahaddin Orhan] Erciyes Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-38010 Kayseri, Turkey; [Kahraman, Nafiz] Erciyes Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, TR-38010 Kayseri, Turkey; [Kaya, Mustafa] Siirt Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, TR-56100 Siirt, Turkey; [Sarikoc, Selcuk] Amasya Univ, Tasova Vocat Sch, Amasya, Turkey; [Kivrak, Hilal Demir] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Fac Engn & Architectural Sci, Dept Chem Engn, Eskisehir, Turkeyen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000766452500006en_US
dc.authorwosidAtabani, Abdulaziz/L-5926-2019
dc.authorwosidDemir KIVRAK, Hilal/HJI-7095-2023
dc.authorwosidARSLAN, ESENAY/AES-4961-2022
dc.authorwosidAtelge, Muhamed Raşit/AAR-7987-2020
dc.authorwosidAbut, Serdar/GRJ-0284-2022
dc.authorwosidSarıkoç, Selçuk/AAA-1378-2020
dc.authorwosidARSLAN, ESENAY/CAA-3029-2022


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster