• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Robot-assisted approach improves surgical outcomes in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Date

2017

Author

Malkoc, Ercan
Maurice, Matthew J.
Kara, Onder
Ramirez, Daniel
Nelson, Ryan J.
Caputo, Peter A.
Mouracade, Pascal
Stein, Robert
Kaouk, Jihad H.

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Objectives To assess the impact of approach on surgical outcomes in otherwise healthy obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. Patients and Methods Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we abstracted data on otherwise healthy (Charlson comorbidity score <= 1 and bilateral kidneys), obese patients (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) with small renal masses (< 4 cm) treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcomes were intraoperative transfusion, operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. The association between approach, open (OPN) vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and outcomes was assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Covariates included age, gender, obesity severity, tumour size and tumour complexity. Results Of 237 obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, 25% underwent OPN and 75% underwent RAPN. Apart from larger tumour size in the OPN group (2.8 vs 2.5 cm; P = 0.02), there was no significant difference between groups. The rate of intra-operative blood transfusion (1.1 vs 10%; P = 0.01), the median operating time (180 vs 207 min; P < 0.01) and the median ischaemia time (19.5 vs 27 min; P < 0.01) were all greater for OPN. The LOS was significantly shorter for RAPN (3 vs 4 days; P < 0.01). While the overall complication rate was higher for OPN (15.8 vs 31.7%; P < 0.01), major complications were not significantly different (5.6 vs 1.7%; P = 0.20). On multivariable analyses, OPN independently predicted longer operating time, longer length of stay, and more overall complications. Conclusions At a high-volume centre, the robot-assisted approach offers less blood transfusion, shorter operating time, faster recovery, and fewer peri-operative complications compared with the open approach in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. In this setting, RAPN may be a preferable treatment option.

Source

BJU INTERNATIONAL

Volume

119

Issue

2

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.13675
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/1079

Collections

  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2182]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Instruction || Guide || Library || Amasya University || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: