Robot-assisted approach improves surgical outcomes in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy
Erişim
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessTarih
2017Yazar
Malkoc, ErcanMaurice, Matthew J.
Kara, Onder
Ramirez, Daniel
Nelson, Ryan J.
Caputo, Peter A.
Mouracade, Pascal
Stein, Robert
Kaouk, Jihad H.
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterÖzet
Objectives To assess the impact of approach on surgical outcomes in otherwise healthy obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. Patients and Methods Using our institutional partial nephrectomy database, we abstracted data on otherwise healthy (Charlson comorbidity score <= 1 and bilateral kidneys), obese patients (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) with small renal masses (< 4 cm) treated between 2011 and 2015. The primary outcomes were intraoperative transfusion, operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. The association between approach, open (OPN) vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), and outcomes was assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Covariates included age, gender, obesity severity, tumour size and tumour complexity. Results Of 237 obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, 25% underwent OPN and 75% underwent RAPN. Apart from larger tumour size in the OPN group (2.8 vs 2.5 cm; P = 0.02), there was no significant difference between groups. The rate of intra-operative blood transfusion (1.1 vs 10%; P = 0.01), the median operating time (180 vs 207 min; P < 0.01) and the median ischaemia time (19.5 vs 27 min; P < 0.01) were all greater for OPN. The LOS was significantly shorter for RAPN (3 vs 4 days; P < 0.01). While the overall complication rate was higher for OPN (15.8 vs 31.7%; P < 0.01), major complications were not significantly different (5.6 vs 1.7%; P = 0.20). On multivariable analyses, OPN independently predicted longer operating time, longer length of stay, and more overall complications. Conclusions At a high-volume centre, the robot-assisted approach offers less blood transfusion, shorter operating time, faster recovery, and fewer peri-operative complications compared with the open approach in obese patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for small renal masses. In this setting, RAPN may be a preferable treatment option.