• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of spinal mobilisation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomised controlled trial

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2024

Author

Kucuk, Eylem
Oten, Erol
Coskun, Gursoy

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of spinal mobilisation on curvature magnitude, angle of trunk rotation (ATR) and pulmonary function in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: Conducted as a double-blind randomised controlled trial, the study included 40 patients with AIS (Cobb angles 10 degrees-25 degrees) randomised to experimental (n = 20; female = 12, male = 8; age = 12.9 +/- 1.8 mean +/- SD) and control (n = 20; female = 13, male = 7; age = 12.85 +/- 1.81 mean +/- SD) groups. The experimental group received spinal mobilisation for 30 min per session followed by 60 min of core stabilisation exercises (CSE), twice a week for 10 weeks. The control group received CSE only at the same frequency and duration. Evaluation of Cobb angle, ATR and pulmonary function tests (PEF: Peak Expiratory Flow, FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s, FVC: Forced Vital Capacity, and FEV1/FVC: Tiffeneau index) were performed at baseline and after the intervention. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in Cobb angle, ATR, PEF and FVC, with the experimental group showing significantly greater improvements in Cobb angle (-7.65 +/- 3.17) and ATR (-2.5 +/- 1.43) compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, while the control group showed no change in FEV1, the experimental group showed improvement. There was no change in FEV1/FVC ratio in either group. Conclusion: These results indicate that adding spinal mobilisation to treatment sessions can effectively reduce the magnitude of curvature and improve scoliosis-related problems in the short term.

Volume

60

Issue

11

URI

https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16650
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/5956

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [458]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1574]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2182]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Instruction || Guide || Library || Amasya University || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: