• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

GEOID UNDULATION PREDICTION USING GAUSSIAN PROCESSES REGRESSION: A CASE STUDY IN A LOCAL REGION IN TURKEY

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-rights

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2021

Author

Konakoglu, Berkant
Akar, Alper

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

In order to convert ellipsoidal heights obtained by the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) to orthometric heights, it is necessary to know the distance between the ellipsoidal and geoid surface, called the geoid undulation. The geoid undulation can be predicted using emerging mathematics tools and algorithms. The objective of this study was to develop a model for predicting the geoid undulation using Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), one of the soft machine learning algorithms having different covariance functions. This method was then compared with the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), generalized regression neural network (GRNN), and the interpolation method of inverse distance to a power (IDP) with the power of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. First, 70 % of GNSS/leveling data (422 points) were used in the training phase. The remaining 185 points were used as testing data to check the effectiveness of the constructed model. In the GPR modeling, ten covariance functions (Materniso d = 1, 3, 5; Maternard d = 1, 3, 5; SEiso; SEard; RQiso; and RQard) were tested for prediction on this dataset. The GPR based on the Materniso (d = 1) covariance function model was introduced as an effective method for predicting geoid undulation and provided the best results (RMSE = 8.32 cm, MAE = 5.51 cm, R-2 = 0.98968) when compared with the other developed GPR models. In addition, the statistical findings showed that the accuracy of all the GPR models was also better in predicting geoid undulation than the RBFNN, GRNN, and IDP with the power of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Volume

18

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2021.0001
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12450/2473

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1574]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2182]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Amasya

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherCategoryLanguageAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Instruction || Guide || Library || Amasya University || OAI-PMH ||

Amasya Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, Amasya, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: openaccess@amasya.edu.tr

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Amasya by Amasya University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Amasya: